Offroad Trailblazers and Envoys

Radflo's Question

BDS, ReadyLift, Smaxx... You name it, we know about it here.

by Trail X » Wed Sep 25, 2013 9:48 am

$100 off would be a 10% drop, which seems like a fair bit. Let's hope Johny can talk with radflo about it and get them in on it. I think it would be in everyone's best interest to get a bunch of members running them. It could start a nice snowball effect.

Kyle, did you get to drive it offroad at all? I noticed a huge difference in how it handled potholes and dips. If I get them, I'd also feel comfortable getting rid of all swaybars.
8-) Build Thread | ExPo Build | YouTube Videos
Not all who wander are lost. -Tolkien
User avatar
Trail X
Founder
 
Posts: 9925
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 10:22 pm
Location: VA, Roanoke
Name: James Downing
Vehicle Year: 2005
Vehicle: Chevrolet TrailBlazer
DriveTrain: 4WD w/ Aftermarket Locker
Rank: Expedition Guide

by HARDTRAILZ » Wed Sep 25, 2013 9:54 am

Not offroad but I drive at 10% of the speed you do offroad. I am generally crawling around not hitting whoops. If they offered more flex it would be different but the travel does not change and that is all I ever want for offroad.

I don't need sway bars now. So that's a non issue.

I bet they are great, but I just can't see them providing anything I need at that price point. Maybe 500 but that is unrealistic and I accept that. If I was starting from scratch...it would be far more tempting. Selling my current setup wont get me much and I have not ever found myself saying...I wish I had the Radflo's. It may just be my use or driving style or whatever. Right now mine sits good and works good. Maybe its the combo of weight and whatever up front but I can bump around the two tracks at our property pretty quick without any issues. No one ever complains about the ride and some actually compliment it.

I guess if someone wanted my front 3 inch lift, 88s and HD Bilstiens for $400...I might be willing to give them a shot.

For the 2 sets out there....How much lift do you have? I do not want to lose any and know Mikes are ran at far less than my current setup is. I wonder how they preform up at my level.
I hate to advocate weird chemicals, alcohol, violence or insanity to anyone...but
they've always worked for me.
User avatar
HARDTRAILZ
Moderator
 
Posts: 6342
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 1:49 am
Location: IN, Batesville
Name: Kyle
Vehicle Year: 2006
Vehicle: Chevrolet TrailBlazer
DriveTrain: 4WD w/ Aftermarket Locker
Rank: Extreme Offroader

by mikekey » Wed Sep 25, 2013 10:51 am

Thought these where adjustable or you can get them made up to 4 inchs in additional lift? I'm probably going to ask for at least 3.5.
Once lifted 03 Trailblazer on 35's, gave it up to travel the USA with my family.
User avatar
mikekey
Lifer
 
Posts: 2585
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 4:08 am
Location: North America
Name: Mike
Vehicle Year: 2003
Vehicle: Chevrolet TrailBlazer
DriveTrain: 4WD w/ G80
Rank: Expedition Rated

by dvanbramer88 » Wed Sep 25, 2013 10:53 am

Yes, you can adjust ride height.
Chevy Power!
Long live the Republic
"Violence is not always evil. The judicious use of violence and those willing to use it without hesitation is often all that stands between wolves and sheep."

Build Thread
User avatar
dvanbramer88
Lifer
 
Posts: 2283
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 3:12 pm
Location: PA, Bristol
Name: Dave
Vehicle Year: 2002
Vehicle: Chevrolet TrailBlazer
DriveTrain: 4WD
Rank: Trail Ready

by HARDTRAILZ » Wed Sep 25, 2013 11:08 am

I know they are adjustable, but I don't think either of them are running them up high. Not sure if it will affect performance or not.
I hate to advocate weird chemicals, alcohol, violence or insanity to anyone...but
they've always worked for me.
User avatar
HARDTRAILZ
Moderator
 
Posts: 6342
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 1:49 am
Location: IN, Batesville
Name: Kyle
Vehicle Year: 2006
Vehicle: Chevrolet TrailBlazer
DriveTrain: 4WD w/ Aftermarket Locker
Rank: Extreme Offroader

by ErikSS » Wed Sep 25, 2013 11:11 am

mikekey wrote:Thought these where adjustable or you can get them made up to 4 inchs in additional lift? I'm probably going to ask for at least 3.5.

I want that too. Moots has his about 3/4 down (75% of lift) and it looks like just enough to me. However... I think my spongy soft front springs helped my articulation therefore climbing ability.
It's not how fast you go. It's how quick you get there. Lifted TBSS Build
User avatar
ErikSS
Lifer
 
Posts: 2044
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 5:23 pm
Location: IL, Flossmoor
Name: Erik
Vehicle Year: 2008
Vehicle: Chevrolet TrailBlazer
DriveTrain: 4WD w/ Limited Slip
Rank: Offroad Rated

by Karo » Wed Sep 25, 2013 11:20 am

I have asked myself in the past if a bodylift could increase the amount of travel from the coilover, I mean that the chassis is higher with the dome mounts from the suspension, if that is the case you have to preload the coilover more then without the bodylift to get the same "stiffness" is that correct ?
I know that the length for the coilover is the same for the Trailblazer with or without body lift, but there must be a difference in the travel high or the stiffness or something I didn´t understand.

Karsten
User avatar
Karo
Trail-Blazer
 
Posts: 342
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 3:02 am
Location: Berlin Germany 52°30'35.16"N, 13°15'31.99"E
Name: Karsten
Vehicle Year: 2002
Vehicle: Chevrolet TrailBlazer
DriveTrain: 4WD w/ G80
Rank: Trail Ready

by HARDTRAILZ » Wed Sep 25, 2013 11:24 am

Body lift does not affect suspension, just tire clearance.
I hate to advocate weird chemicals, alcohol, violence or insanity to anyone...but
they've always worked for me.
User avatar
HARDTRAILZ
Moderator
 
Posts: 6342
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 1:49 am
Location: IN, Batesville
Name: Kyle
Vehicle Year: 2006
Vehicle: Chevrolet TrailBlazer
DriveTrain: 4WD w/ Aftermarket Locker
Rank: Extreme Offroader

by Karo » Wed Sep 25, 2013 11:33 am

HARDTRAILZ wrote:Body lift does not affect suspension, just tire clearance.



I thought the lower control arms are mounted to the frame and the coilover is mounted to the lower control arm. The upper mounts of the coilover are mounted to the chassis (dome), when you have the bodylift installed you have more distance between frame and the chassis.

This picture is only a example for extending the upper mounting point for a coil over, but it is the same idea behind what I thought.

Image
User avatar
Karo
Trail-Blazer
 
Posts: 342
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 3:02 am
Location: Berlin Germany 52°30'35.16"N, 13°15'31.99"E
Name: Karsten
Vehicle Year: 2002
Vehicle: Chevrolet TrailBlazer
DriveTrain: 4WD w/ G80
Rank: Trail Ready

by bgwolfpack » Wed Sep 25, 2013 11:39 am

Karo wrote:
HARDTRAILZ wrote:Body lift does not affect suspension, just tire clearance.



I thought the lower control arms are mounted to the frame and the coilover is mounted to the lower control arm. The upper mounts of the coilover are mounted to the chassis (dome), when you have the bodylift installed you have more distance between frame and the chassis.

No. The Dome Mounts are part of the frame, not body.
bgwolfpack
Veteran
 
Posts: 1794
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 7:19 pm
Name: Randy
Vehicle Year: Other
Vehicle: Other Vehicle
DriveTrain: 4WD

by Karo » Wed Sep 25, 2013 11:44 am

bgwolfpack wrote:
Karo wrote:
HARDTRAILZ wrote:Body lift does not affect suspension, just tire clearance.



I thought the lower control arms are mounted to the frame and the coilover is mounted to the lower control arm. The upper mounts of the coilover are mounted to the chassis (dome), when you have the bodylift installed you have more distance between frame and the chassis.

No. The Dome Mounts are part of the frame, not body.


:cheers: So I have learned something today! :D Thanks. But we could still extend the amount of travel with that kind of dome..
:coffee2:
User avatar
Karo
Trail-Blazer
 
Posts: 342
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 3:02 am
Location: Berlin Germany 52°30'35.16"N, 13°15'31.99"E
Name: Karsten
Vehicle Year: 2002
Vehicle: Chevrolet TrailBlazer
DriveTrain: 4WD w/ G80
Rank: Trail Ready

by The Roadie » Wed Sep 25, 2013 11:53 am

Image
User avatar
The Roadie
Founder
 
Posts: 5012
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 11:29 pm
Location: OR, Portland area
Name: Bill Carton
Vehicle Year: 2004
Vehicle: GMC Envoy
DriveTrain: 4WD w/ G80
Rank: Expedition Guide

by Karo » Wed Sep 25, 2013 11:55 am

The Roadie wrote:Image


I´m an idiot, I´ll print that out..
User avatar
Karo
Trail-Blazer
 
Posts: 342
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 3:02 am
Location: Berlin Germany 52°30'35.16"N, 13°15'31.99"E
Name: Karsten
Vehicle Year: 2002
Vehicle: Chevrolet TrailBlazer
DriveTrain: 4WD w/ G80
Rank: Trail Ready

by The Roadie » Wed Sep 25, 2013 2:20 pm

Karo wrote:I´m an idiot, I´ll print that out..
Not an idiot, but you need to spend more time on your back on the ground, memorizing the bottom of the vehicle.

Getting a body lift is also a good way to burn the design into your mind. (Plus get at the rear spark plug)
User avatar
The Roadie
Founder
 
Posts: 5012
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 11:29 pm
Location: OR, Portland area
Name: Bill Carton
Vehicle Year: 2004
Vehicle: GMC Envoy
DriveTrain: 4WD w/ G80
Rank: Expedition Guide

by bgwolfpack » Wed Sep 25, 2013 2:47 pm

And the rear bolts for the intake! (what a bitch, stupid damn set-up)!!!

Mannyfooled!
bgwolfpack
Veteran
 
Posts: 1794
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 7:19 pm
Name: Randy
Vehicle Year: Other
Vehicle: Other Vehicle
DriveTrain: 4WD

by Trail X » Wed Sep 25, 2013 2:55 pm

Karo wrote: But we could still extend the amount of travel with that kind of dome..
:coffee2:


Not really.

Our limitation isn't so much up, it's down. And we can't extend the downward limitation further due to the CV shaft bolting to the diff/disconnect.

If we could move the diff/disconnect down, we could increase the downward travel. The issue is that our diff/disconnect is bolted to our engine. It's hard to move an engine down.
8-) Build Thread | ExPo Build | YouTube Videos
Not all who wander are lost. -Tolkien
User avatar
Trail X
Founder
 
Posts: 9925
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 10:22 pm
Location: VA, Roanoke
Name: James Downing
Vehicle Year: 2005
Vehicle: Chevrolet TrailBlazer
DriveTrain: 4WD w/ Aftermarket Locker
Rank: Expedition Guide

by v7guy » Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:05 pm

I know with my current setup the spindle/spring seems to be the limitation. With the wheel off and the suspension at full droop the CV still turns by hand easily and the spindle rests on the spring. With the spring/shock removed the suspension drops quite a bit more and then I run into CV at too high of an angle and the balljoint being maxed out. The smaller coil on the radflo would get me a bit more travel. I'd have to check to see what would limit it next.

I'm a big fan of the radflos since I've driven Matts truck quite a few times. The ride is smoother on and off road and despite having heavier springs than 89s it's more responsive. It's why I've been telling people to just pony up and get them. I think the vast majority of people would be much happier with the radflos.
build thread

All things in moderation, including moderation.
Some people never go crazy... what truly horrible lives they must lead
User avatar
v7guy
Moderator
 
Posts: 3712
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 10:17 pm
Location: NY, long island
Name: Jason
Vehicle Year: 2004
Vehicle: Chevrolet TrailBlazer
DriveTrain: 4WD
Rank: Offroad Rated

by bartonmd » Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:29 pm

The other reason Kyle didn't see much difference driving mine is because his has wider 35" tires at a lower pressure, and mine has stock width 30.5" tires at a higher pressure, so mine will ride rougher than his, anyway, all things being equal. This last spring's TECORE trip, I was able to keep up with James on the trail with no drama, fully disconnected, still running 30psi in the tires. Regardless of how one person's setup with Radflos compares to somebody else's completely different setup, I can tell you that they made a night and day difference in mine, off road.

Mike
bartonmd
Moderator
 
Posts: 4469
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:35 am
Location: IN, Indianapolis
Name: Mike
Vehicle Year: 2007
Vehicle: Chevrolet TrailBlazer
DriveTrain: 4WD w/ G80
Rank: Offroad Rated

by HARDTRAILZ » Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:34 pm

I dont doubt they're better but I can't justify the cost when I am happy currently.
I hate to advocate weird chemicals, alcohol, violence or insanity to anyone...but
they've always worked for me.
User avatar
HARDTRAILZ
Moderator
 
Posts: 6342
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 1:49 am
Location: IN, Batesville
Name: Kyle
Vehicle Year: 2006
Vehicle: Chevrolet TrailBlazer
DriveTrain: 4WD w/ Aftermarket Locker
Rank: Extreme Offroader

by bartonmd » Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:54 pm

HARDTRAILZ wrote:I dont doubt they're better but I can't justify the cost when I am happy currently.


I don't disagree with you at all! The reason I did them was because I needed to buy a lift, anyway. I'm just explaining to everybody else why you didn't think mine rode much better than yours.

Mike
bartonmd
Moderator
 
Posts: 4469
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:35 am
Location: IN, Indianapolis
Name: Mike
Vehicle Year: 2007
Vehicle: Chevrolet TrailBlazer
DriveTrain: 4WD w/ G80
Rank: Offroad Rated

PreviousNext

Return to Lifts / Suspension

cron